Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Draup vs Zoho Recruit
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Zoho Recruit
Zoho Recruit is a cloud-based applicant tracking and recruiting platform whose Zia AI assistant performs resume parsing, skills-based candidate-to-job matching, match scoring, sourcing, and AI-assisted screening and assessments.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Draup and Zoho Recruit tie at 42.
Draup (Sourcing) and Zoho Recruit (ATS-integrated) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Draup leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Zoho Recruit 4, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency, at 18%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Draup (Draup 33, Zoho Recruit 24), 51% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Post-Market Monitoring, Draup 28 to Zoho Recruit 40.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Draup3
- Zoho Recruit4
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring28 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Zoho Recruit is in scope of
| Record | Draup | Zoho Recruit |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2017 | 1996 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight28% of the movement so far
Draup33Zoho Recruit241.6 weighted points to Draup
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight53% of the movement so far
Draup28Zoho Recruit401.4 weighted points to Zoho Recruit
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight70% of the movement so far
Draup58Zoho Recruit501.0 weighted points to Draup
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight83% of the movement so far
Draup25Zoho Recruit300.8 weighted points to Zoho Recruit
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight93% of the movement so far
Draup48Zoho Recruit450.6 weighted points to Draup
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Draup57Zoho Recruit600.2 weighted points to Zoho Recruit
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Draup54Zoho Recruit550.1 weighted points to Zoho Recruit
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus Zoho Recruit, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Draup | Zoho Recruit | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 24 | +9 | +1.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 42F | 42F | - | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | Zoho Recruit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Draup sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zoho Recruit last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.