§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Feenyx on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Eightfold AI (Sourcing) opens a 24-point lead on Feenyx (Assessment), 64 (D) to 40 (F). Feenyx leads none of the 7 criteria, and Eightfold AI is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Eightfold AI 85, Feenyx 25 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Feenyx under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Feenyx is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Eightfold AI | Feenyx |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · Feenyx 25
10.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · Feenyx 42
6.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · Feenyx 25
3.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Eightfold AI 60 · Feenyx 50
1.5 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · Feenyx 38
1.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · Feenyx 55
0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · Feenyx 58
0.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +24.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +24.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Feenyx.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Feenyx | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 42 | +33 | +6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 25 | +60 | +10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 25 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 38 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 40 (F) | +24 | +24.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Feenyx | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI and Feenyx sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next