§ The result
3 points separate Eightfold AI and HeyMilo.
Eightfold AI (Sourcing) edges HeyMilo (Screening) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 64 to 61. Eightfold AI leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HeyMilo leads 3, including Human Oversight Design. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Eightfold AI 75, HeyMilo 58 — and at a 20% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Eightfold AI | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · HeyMilo 58
3.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · HeyMilo 64
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · HeyMilo 46
0.5 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · HeyMilo 66
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · HeyMilo 42
0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
18% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · HeyMilo 83
0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Eightfold AI 60 · HeyMilo 62
0.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 58 | +17 | +3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 83 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 42 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 46 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 61 (D) | +3 | +3.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next