§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Hogan Assessments by 17 points.
Eightfold AI finishes 17 points clear of Hogan Assessments under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 47 (F) — across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Eightfold AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Hogan Assessments leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Eightfold AI 85, Hogan Assessments 44 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Hogan Assessments under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Eightfold AI | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 1987 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · Hogan Assessments 44
7.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · Hogan Assessments 50
5.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · Hogan Assessments 36
1.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Eightfold AI 60 · Hogan Assessments 52
1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · Hogan Assessments 40
1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · Hogan Assessments 52
1.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · Hogan Assessments 62
0.2 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Hogan Assessments.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 50 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 44 | +41 | +7.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 36 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 40 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 47 (F) | +17 | +16.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next