§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Oleeo on all 7 criteria.
Eightfold AI finishes 24 points clear of Oleeo under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 40 (F) — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Eightfold AI leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Oleeo leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Eightfold AI 85, Oleeo 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
Oleeo
Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Oleeo under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Oleeo is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Eightfold AI | Oleeo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2016 | 1995 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · Oleeo 40
8.1 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · Oleeo 40
7.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · Oleeo 25
3.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · Oleeo 30
2.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Eightfold AI 60 · Oleeo 45
2.3 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · Oleeo 55
0.6 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · Oleeo 55
0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +23.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Oleeo.
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Oleeo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 40 | +35 | +7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 40 | +45 | +8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 25 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 40 (F) | +24 | +23.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Oleeo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oleeo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next