§ The result
Eightfold AI leads Pymetrics (Harver Games) on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Eightfold AI scores 64 (D) and Pymetrics (Harver Games) 56 (F) under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. Eightfold AI leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Pymetrics (Harver Games) is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Eightfold AI leads is Article 11 Technical Documentation, Eightfold AI 75 to Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Eightfold AI 45, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Eightfold AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Eightfold AI
Talent intelligence platform offering candidate matching, internal mobility, and career-site personalization on top of a deep-learning talent graph.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
Eightfold AI is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Eightfold AI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 36% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Eightfold AI 45 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
3.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Eightfold AI 50 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
1.8 weighted points to Eightfold AI
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Eightfold AI 60 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
1.2 weighted points to Eightfold AI
20% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Eightfold AI 75 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
1.0 weighted points to Eightfold AI
18% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Eightfold AI 85 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
0.9 weighted points to Eightfold AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Eightfold AI 60 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
0.4 weighted points to Eightfold AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Eightfold AI minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | Eightfold AI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 75 | 70 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 85 | 80 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 45 | 25 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 35 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 64 (D) | 56 (F) | +8 | +8.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Eightfold AI | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Eightfold AI has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Eightfold AI and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for Eightfold AI, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Eightfold AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next