Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0
Enhancv vs Jobscan
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Concerning
Resume AI
Jobscan
Jobscan scores a job seeker's resume against a specific job description on a 0-100 ATS match rate, flags missing hard- and soft-skill keywords and ATS formatting problems, and bundles a resume builder, LinkedIn optimizer, cover-letter generator, application tracker and a review-gated Auto Apply that drafts answers to ATS-hosted application forms.
Concerning
Resume AI
The result
Enhancv leads Jobscan on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Enhancv finishes 5 points ahead of Jobscan under rubric js-v1.0, 68 to 63, both scored as Resume AI entries. Enhancv leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Jobscan is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Enhancv leads is User Control & Transparency, Enhancv 80 to Jobscan 78. Pricing & Cancellation Fairness is the widest raw gap (Enhancv 62, Jobscan 48) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data & Credential Safety at 20% (Enhancv 60, Jobscan 52), 35% of the weighted advantage Enhancv builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Enhancv5
- Jobscan0
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Pricing & Cancellation Fairness62 vs 48
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data & Credential Safety20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Enhancv and Jobscan are both filed under Resume & profile AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | Enhancv | Jobscan |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data & Credential Safety
20% weight35% of the movement so far
Enhancv60Jobscan521.6 weighted points to Enhancv
- 2
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
10% weight65% of the movement so far
Enhancv62Jobscan481.4 weighted points to Enhancv
- 3
Effectiveness Evidence
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Enhancv52Jobscan450.8 weighted points to Enhancv
- 4
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
15% weight93% of the movement so far
Enhancv78Jobscan750.4 weighted points to Enhancv
- 5
User Control & Transparency
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Enhancv80Jobscan780.3 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Jobscan, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Jobscan | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 68 | - | - |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 78 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 75 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 72 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 68D | 63D | +5 | +4.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Jobscan | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Jobscan has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobscan sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobscan, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobscan last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against