§ The result
Enhancv leads Jobscan on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Enhancv scores 68 and Jobscan 63 under rubric js-v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Resume AI cohort. Enhancv leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Jobscan is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Enhancv leads is User Control & Transparency, Enhancv 80 to Jobscan 78. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Pricing & Cancellation Fairness (Enhancv 62, Jobscan 48) and Data & Credential Safety at 20% (Enhancv 60, Jobscan 52), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Jobscan
Jobscan scores a job seeker's resume against a specific job description on a 0-100 ATS match rate, flags missing hard- and soft-skill keywords and ATS formatting problems, and bundles a resume builder, LinkedIn optimizer, cover-letter generator, application tracker and a review-gated Auto Apply that drafts answers to ATS-hosted application forms.
§ The record
Enhancv and Jobscan are both filed under Resume & profile AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | Enhancv | Jobscan |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Jobscan 52
1.6 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · Jobscan 48
1.4 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Jobscan 45
0.8 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Jobscan 75
0.4 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Jobscan 78
0.3 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +4.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Jobscan.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Jobscan | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 68 | - | - |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 78 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 75 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 72 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 63 (D) | +5 | +4.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Jobscan | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Jobscan has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobscan sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobscan, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobscan last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against