§ The result
Equalture leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Equalture sits 11 points above Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 33 — with Equalture filed under Assessment and Entelo under Sourcing. Equalture leads every one of the 7 criteria, Entelo none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Entelo 35 to Equalture 38. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 20, Equalture 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Equalture under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Equalture is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Entelo | Equalture |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2011 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Equalture 40
3.6 weighted points to Equalture
20% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Equalture 45
3.0 weighted points to Equalture
8% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Equalture 60
1.6 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Equalture 55
1.5 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Equalture 50
1.0 weighted points to Equalture
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · Equalture 30
0.8 weighted points to Equalture
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Equalture 38
0.4 weighted points to Equalture
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Equalture.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Equalture | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 44 (F) | -11 | -11.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Equalture | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next