§ The result
Feenyx leads Entelo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Feenyx, filed under Assessment, finishes on 40 and Entelo, filed under Sourcing, on 33, 7 points apart. Entelo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Feenyx takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Post-Market Monitoring, Entelo 35 to Feenyx 38. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Entelo 42, Feenyx 58) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Entelo 30, Feenyx 42), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage Feenyx holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Feenyx under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Feenyx is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Entelo | Feenyx |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Feenyx 42
2.4 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Feenyx 58
1.9 weighted points to Feenyx
8% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Feenyx 55
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
18% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Feenyx 25
0.9 weighted points to Feenyx
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Feenyx 50
0.8 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Feenyx 38
0.4 weighted points to Feenyx
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Feenyx.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Feenyx | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 25 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 40 (F) | -7 | -7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Feenyx | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next