§ The result
HackerRank leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
HackerRank finishes 22 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 55 against 33 — across the Assessment and Sourcing cohorts. HackerRank leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Entelo leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 20, HackerRank 68, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage HackerRank holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical skills assessment platform for developer hiring that uses coding tests, interviews, and AI-based features (question generation, ML plagiarism/AI-code detection, and image-analysis proctoring) to evaluate candidates.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HackerRank under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HackerRank is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Entelo | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · HackerRank 68
8.6 weighted points to HackerRank
20% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · HackerRank 60
6.0 weighted points to HackerRank
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · HackerRank 60
2.2 weighted points to HackerRank
8% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · HackerRank 62
1.8 weighted points to HackerRank
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · HackerRank 35
1.5 weighted points to HackerRank
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · HackerRank 55
1.5 weighted points to HackerRank
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · HackerRank 45
1.2 weighted points to HackerRank
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -22.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus HackerRank.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | HackerRank | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 60 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 68 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 45 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 55 (F) | -22 | -22.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | HackerRank | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HackerRank last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next