§ The result
HiPeople leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between HiPeople (Assessment) and Entelo (Sourcing): 61 (D) for HiPeople, 33 (F) for Entelo. HiPeople leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Entelo leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Entelo 20, HiPeople 84 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HiPeople is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Entelo | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · HiPeople 84
11.5 weighted points to HiPeople
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · HiPeople 62
6.4 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · HiPeople 60
3.0 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · HiPeople 62
2.4 weighted points to HiPeople
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · HiPeople 66
2.1 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · HiPeople 58
1.9 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · HiPeople 35
1.5 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -28.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 62 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 84 | -64 | -11.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 62 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 60 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 66 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 61 (D) | -28 | -28.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next