HomeCompareEntelo vs Mercor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs Mercor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Entelo leads Mercor on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Entelo sits 10 points above Mercor under rubric v1.0 — 33 against 23 — with Entelo filed under Sourcing and Mercor under Screening. Entelo leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Mercor is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Entelo leads is FRIA Support, Entelo 25 to Mercor 20. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 45, Mercor 22, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Entelo holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Mercor under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Mercor is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEnteloMercor
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20112023

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · Mercor 22

    3.4 weighted points to Entelo

  2. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · Mercor 10

    1.8 weighted points to Entelo

  3. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · Mercor 20

    1.8 weighted points to Entelo

  4. 20% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · Mercor 22

    1.6 weighted points to Entelo

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · Mercor 20

    0.8 weighted points to Entelo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +9.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus Mercor.

CategoryWeightEnteloMercorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3022+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2010+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2520+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4522+23+3.4
Human Oversight Design12%4242--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3520+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%4040--
Total100%33 (F)23 (F)+10+9.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloMercor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2211
FRIA Support15%0112
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain108Sources on the vendor's own domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Mercor has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for Mercor, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Mercor last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.