§ The result
PageUp leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 31 points between PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Entelo (Sourcing): 64 (D) for PageUp, 33 (F) for Entelo. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Entelo leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Entelo 20, PageUp 80, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2011 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · PageUp 80
10.8 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · PageUp 74
8.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · PageUp 63
2.7 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · PageUp 64
2.6 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · PageUp 55
2.4 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · PageUp 63
1.8 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -31.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 31.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -31 beside that -31.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 74 | -44 | -8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 63 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 64 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 63 | -23 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 64 (D) | -31 | -31.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next