§ The result
Pinpoint leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint finishes 24 points clear of Entelo under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 33 — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Entelo leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 30, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Entelo
Entelo is an AI-powered talent sourcing and diversity-recruiting platform that aggregates hundreds of millions of public candidate profiles and applies predictive machine-learning models to score, rank, and surface (including underrepresented) candidates for recruiters.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Entelo | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Entelo 30 · Pinpoint 72
8.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Entelo 20 · Pinpoint 42
4.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Entelo 45 · Pinpoint 68
3.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Entelo 42 · Pinpoint 64
2.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Entelo 40 · Pinpoint 66
2.1 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Entelo 35 · Pinpoint 52
2.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Entelo 25 · Pinpoint 38
1.9 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -24.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Entelo minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Entelo | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 72 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 42 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 68 | -23 | -3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 42 | 64 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 40 | 66 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 57 (F) | -24 | -24.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Entelo | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Entelo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next