HomeCompareEntelo vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Entelo on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Saville Assessment (Assessment) opens a 15-point lead on Entelo (Sourcing), 48 to 33. Entelo leads none of the 7 criteria, and Saville Assessment is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Entelo 20, Saville Assessment 42) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Entelo 30, Saville Assessment 50), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEnteloSaville Assessment
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20112004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Entelo 30 · Saville Assessment 50

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Entelo 20 · Saville Assessment 42

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · Saville Assessment 40

    2.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 8% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · Saville Assessment 60

    1.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  6. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Entelo 35 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightEnteloSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3050-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2042-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2540-15-2.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4555-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4255-13-1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3538-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%4060-20-1.6
Total100%33 (F)48 (F)-15-15.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11—51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22—41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11—60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.