HomeCompareEntelo vs Toggl Hire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Entelo vs Toggl Hire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Toggl Hire leads Entelo on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Toggl Hire (Assessment) edges Entelo (Sourcing) by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 37 to 33. Toggl Hire leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Entelo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Toggl Hire leads is FRIA Support, Entelo 25 to Toggl Hire 30. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Entelo 45, Toggl Hire 55, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Toggl Hire holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Entelo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEnteloToggl Hire
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSEE
Founded20112013

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Entelo 45 · Toggl Hire 55

    1.5 weighted points to Toggl Hire

  2. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Entelo 42 · Toggl Hire 52

    1.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire

  3. 8% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Entelo 40 · Toggl Hire 50

    0.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Entelo 25 · Toggl Hire 30

    0.8 weighted points to Toggl Hire

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -4.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Entelo minus Toggl Hire.

CategoryWeightEnteloToggl HireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2020--
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4555-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%4252-10-1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3535--
Customer Documentation8%4050-10-0.8
Total100%33 (F)37 (F)-4-4.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEnteloToggl Hire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2201
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1120Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%98Sources on the vendor's own domain104Sources on the vendor's own domain

Entelo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Entelo, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Entelo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Toggl Hire last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.