Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Equalture vs Retorio
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Retorio
Video-based AI that analyses words, voice, and facial expression/body language to infer Big Five (OCEAN) personality and behavioural traits.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Equalture and Retorio tie at 44.
Equalture and Retorio, both in the Assessment cohort, tie at 44 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Equalture leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Retorio 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Retorio takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Equalture 45, Retorio 50), which is 81% of the weighted advantage Retorio holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Customer Documentation, Equalture 60 to Retorio 50.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Equalture3
- Retorio2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation60 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Equalture and Retorio are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Equalture | Retorio |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | DE |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight32% of the movement so far
Equalture45Retorio501.0 weighted points to Retorio
- 2
Customer Documentation
8% weight58% of the movement so far
Equalture60Retorio500.8 weighted points to Equalture
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Equalture38Retorio330.6 weighted points to Equalture
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Equalture55Retorio520.4 weighted points to Equalture
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Equalture50Retorio520.2 weighted points to Retorio
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus Retorio, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | Retorio | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44F | 44F | - | +0.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | Retorio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Retorio last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against