Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Equalture vs Wonderlic
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
1 point separates Equalture and Wonderlic.
Equalture holds a 1-point edge over Wonderlic under rubric v1.0, 44 to 43, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. Equalture leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Wonderlic leads 3, including Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (Equalture 55, Wonderlic 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 59% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Equalture4
- Wonderlic3
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure55 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Equalture and Wonderlic are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Equalture | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 1937 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight35% of the movement so far
Equalture55Wonderlic382.5 weighted points to Equalture
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight54% of the movement so far
Equalture40Wonderlic481.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight73% of the movement so far
Equalture45Wonderlic521.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight83% of the movement so far
Equalture30Wonderlic250.8 weighted points to Equalture
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Equalture38Wonderlic330.6 weighted points to Equalture
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Equalture60Wonderlic550.4 weighted points to Equalture
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Equalture50Wonderlic520.2 weighted points to Wonderlic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus Wonderlic, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 38 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 44F | 43F | +1 | +1.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.