§ The result
PageUp leads eSkill on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp (ATS-integrated) opens a 23-point lead on eSkill (Assessment), 64 (D) to 41 (F). PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, eSkill none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, eSkill 57 to PageUp 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — eSkill 25, PageUp 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
eSkill
eSkill is a pre-employment testing platform with auto-scored skills, cognitive and behavioral tests and human-rated one-way video interviews, plus an optional Proctorio-powered AI proctoring add-on that gives each candidate a suspicion score and a Claude-based "Linea" layer that drafts assessments from job descriptions.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
eSkill is filed under Assessment AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only eSkill is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | eSkill | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2003 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
eSkill 25 · PageUp 80
9.9 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
eSkill 48 · PageUp 74
5.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
eSkill 47 · PageUp 63
2.4 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
eSkill 36 · PageUp 55
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
eSkill 30 · PageUp 40
1.5 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
eSkill 57 · PageUp 64
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
eSkill 56 · PageUp 63
0.6 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is eSkill minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | eSkill | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 74 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 80 | -55 | -9.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 47 | 63 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 36 | 55 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 63 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 64 (D) | -23 | -22.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | eSkill | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
eSkill has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for eSkill and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for eSkill, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- eSkill last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next