§ The result
Feenyx leads HeroHunt.ai by 10 points.
Feenyx sits 10 points above HeroHunt.ai under rubric v1.0 — 40 against 30 — with Feenyx filed under Assessment and HeroHunt.ai under Sourcing. Feenyx leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while HeroHunt.ai leads 1, including FRIA Support. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Feenyx 42, HeroHunt.ai 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Feenyx holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
HeroHunt.ai
HeroHunt.ai's AI Recruiter (launched as Uwi) searches a claimed 1 billion+ professional profiles, scores and ranks them against a job description with language models, and sends AI-personalised outreach to the candidates a user approves.
§ The record
Feenyx is filed under Assessment AI, HeroHunt.ai under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Feenyx is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Feenyx | HeroHunt.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Feenyx 42 · HeroHunt.ai 20
4.4 weighted points to Feenyx
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Feenyx 25 · HeroHunt.ai 10
2.7 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Feenyx 38 · HeroHunt.ai 28
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Feenyx 50 · HeroHunt.ai 45
0.8 weighted points to Feenyx
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Feenyx 55 · HeroHunt.ai 48
0.6 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Feenyx 58 · HeroHunt.ai 55
0.4 weighted points to Feenyx
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Feenyx 25 · HeroHunt.ai 27
0.3 weighted points to HeroHunt.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Feenyx minus HeroHunt.ai.
| Category | Weight | Feenyx | HeroHunt.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 20 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 10 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 30 (F) | +10 | +9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Feenyx | HeroHunt.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HeroHunt.ai has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx and HeroHunt.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 32 for HeroHunt.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeroHunt.ai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next