§ The result
3 points separate Feenyx and myInterview.
Feenyx holds a 3-point edge over myInterview under rubric v1.0, 40 to 37, across the Assessment and Video interview cohorts. myInterview takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Feenyx, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — myInterview takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Feenyx 25 to myInterview 35, 100% of the weighted advantage myInterview holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Customer Documentation, Feenyx 55 to myInterview 40.
Vendor profile
Feenyx
Feenyx (formerly Filtered.ai) is a skills-assessment and interview platform that runs AI-scored asynchronous coding, video and written assessments and AI-assisted live interviews, with resume scoring, candidate matching, identity verification and fraud/AI-use detection.
Vendor profile
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
§ The record
Feenyx is filed under Assessment AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Feenyx | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Feenyx 25 · myInterview 35
1.8 weighted points to myInterview
15% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Feenyx 50 · myInterview 42
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Feenyx 58 · myInterview 48
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
8% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Feenyx 55 · myInterview 40
1.2 weighted points to Feenyx
20% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Feenyx 42 · myInterview 38
0.8 weighted points to Feenyx
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Feenyx 38 · myInterview 33
0.6 weighted points to Feenyx
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +3.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Feenyx minus myInterview.
| Category | Weight | Feenyx | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 40 (F) | 37 (F) | +3 | +3.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Feenyx | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx and myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Feenyx last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next