§ The result
Findem leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between Findem (Sourcing) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 58 for Findem, 31 for Intervue.io. Findem takes all 7 criteria and Intervue.io none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Findem 60 to Intervue.io 54. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Findem 83, Intervue.io 12) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Findem holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Findem
AI talent-intelligence platform that uses 'attribute'/3D-data enrichment over 850M+ candidate profiles to power candidate search, sourcing, talent CRM, and agentic recruiting workflows.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Findem is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Findem | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Findem 83 · Intervue.io 12
12.8 weighted points to Findem
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Findem 58 · Intervue.io 28
6.0 weighted points to Findem
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Findem 57 · Intervue.io 38
2.9 weighted points to Findem
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Findem 38 · Intervue.io 22
2.4 weighted points to Findem
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Findem 42 · Intervue.io 30
1.4 weighted points to Findem
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Findem 60 · Intervue.io 54
0.7 weighted points to Findem
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Findem 58 · Intervue.io 50
0.6 weighted points to Findem
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Findem minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Findem | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 28 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 12 | +71 | +12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 38 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 31 (F) | +27 | +26.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Findem | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Findem and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Findem last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next