HomeCompareFindem vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Findem vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

1 point separates Findem and Juicebox (PeopleGPT).

Within the Sourcing cohort, Findem edges Juicebox (PeopleGPT) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 58 to 57. Findem leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 3, including Post-Market Monitoring. Post-Market Monitoring is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Juicebox (PeopleGPT) — Findem 42, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55, on a 12% weight — which is 82% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Findem and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordFindemJuicebox (PeopleGPT)
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20192022

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Findem 42 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55

    1.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Findem 58 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52

    1.2 weighted points to Findem

  3. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Findem 60 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50

    1.2 weighted points to Findem

  4. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Findem 38 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35

    0.4 weighted points to Findem

  5. 18% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Findem 83 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84

    0.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Findem 58 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60

    0.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Findem 57 · Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56

    0.1 weighted points to Findem

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Findem minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT).

CategoryWeightFindemJuicebox (PeopleGPT)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5852+6+1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%8384-1-0.2
FRIA Support15%3835+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5756+1+0.1
Human Oversight Design12%6050+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4255-13-1.6
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%58 (F)57 (F)+1+1.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFindemJuicebox (PeopleGPT)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%1111Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%125Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain124Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Findem and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Findem last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.