The result

Findem and Sense tie at 58.

Findem (Sourcing) and Sense (Screening) tie at 58 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Findem leads 1 of the 7 criteria and Sense 5, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Findem 83, Sense 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Findem holds across the 1 criterion it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Findem1
  • Sense5
  • Level1
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency83 vs 72
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Findem is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Sense under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.

RecordFindemSense
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20192016

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight44% of the movement so far

    Findem83
    Sense72

    2.0 weighted points to Findem

  2. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight70% of the movement so far

    Findem42
    Sense52

    1.2 weighted points to Sense

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight81% of the movement so far

    Findem60
    Sense64

    0.5 weighted points to Sense

  4. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight90% of the movement so far

    Findem58
    Sense60

    0.4 weighted points to Sense

  5. Customer Documentation

    8% weight97% of the movement so far

    Findem58
    Sense62

    0.3 weighted points to Sense

  6. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight100% of the movement so far

    Findem57
    Sense58

    0.1 weighted points to Sense

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.6.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Findem minus Sense, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightFindemSenseΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5860-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%8372+11+2.0
FRIA Support15%3838--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5758-1-0.1
Human Oversight Design12%6064-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4252-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5862-4-0.3
Total100%58F58F--0.6

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFindemSense
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11—11Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%125Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain163Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Findem and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Findem last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sense last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next