Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Findem vs Tezi
Findem
AI talent-intelligence platform that uses 'attribute'/3D-data enrichment over 850M+ candidate profiles to power candidate search, sourcing, talent CRM, and agentic recruiting workflows.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Findem and Tezi tie at 58.
Findem (Sourcing) and Tezi (Screening) tie at 58 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Findem leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Tezi 2, with 2 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, is both the widest raw gap (Findem 42, Tezi 58) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 12% weight it makes up 84% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Findem3
- Tezi2
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 58
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Findem is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Findem | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight43% of the movement so far
Findem42Tezi581.9 weighted points to Tezi
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
Findem58Tezi521.2 weighted points to Findem
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight85% of the movement so far
Findem58Tezi500.6 weighted points to Findem
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Findem60Tezi630.4 weighted points to Tezi
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Findem57Tezi550.3 weighted points to Findem
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that -0.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Findem minus Tezi, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Findem | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 83 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 58F | 58F | - | -0.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Findem | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Findem and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Findem last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.