HomeCompareFuel50 vs Harver

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Fuel50 vs Harver

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Fuel50 and Harver.

Fuel50 (Sourcing) edges Harver (Assessment) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 58 to 56. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of Fuel50, with 1 level: Fuel50 is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Harver on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and Harver holds it (Fuel50 68, Harver 80, 18% weight), worth 83% of the weighted advantage Harver builds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Fuel50 is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Harver under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordFuel50Harver
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20112015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Fuel50 68 · Harver 80

    2.2 weighted points to Harver

  2. 15% weight · 55% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Fuel50 64 · Harver 55

    1.3 weighted points to Fuel50

  3. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Fuel50 61 · Harver 50

    1.3 weighted points to Fuel50

  4. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Fuel50 70 · Harver 65

    1.0 weighted points to Fuel50

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Fuel50 32 · Harver 35

    0.4 weighted points to Harver

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Fuel50 62 · Harver 60

    0.2 weighted points to Fuel50

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Fuel50 minus Harver.

CategoryWeightFuel50HarverΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7065+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%6880-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3235-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6455+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%6150+11+1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6260+2+0.2
Total100%58 (F)56 (F)+2+1.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFuel50Harver
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21—10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%40Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain10—
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%244Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain100Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Harver has 10 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 0 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Fuel50 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains, and 10 for Harver, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Fuel50 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Harver last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.