§ The result
Fuel50 leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between Fuel50 (Sourcing) and Intervue.io (Video interview): 58 for Fuel50, 31 for Intervue.io. Fuel50 leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Intervue.io leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Fuel50 68, Intervue.io 12, 18% weight), is only 38% of the weighted advantage Fuel50 builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Fuel50
Fuel50 is an AI internal talent marketplace and workforce-transformation platform that matches employees to internal roles, gigs, mentors, learning and career paths, and fit-scores and ranks internal candidates for open roles and succession pipelines, using a skills ontology curated by in-house I/O psychologists.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
§ The record
Fuel50 is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Fuel50 | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Fuel50 68 · Intervue.io 12
10.1 weighted points to Fuel50
20% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Fuel50 70 · Intervue.io 28
8.4 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Fuel50 64 · Intervue.io 38
3.9 weighted points to Fuel50
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Fuel50 32 · Intervue.io 22
1.5 weighted points to Fuel50
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Fuel50 40 · Intervue.io 30
1.2 weighted points to Fuel50
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Fuel50 62 · Intervue.io 50
1.0 weighted points to Fuel50
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Fuel50 61 · Intervue.io 54
0.8 weighted points to Fuel50
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fuel50 minus Intervue.io.
| Category | Weight | Fuel50 | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 28 | +42 | +8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 12 | +56 | +10.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 22 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 38 | +26 | +3.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 61 | 54 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 31 (F) | +27 | +26.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fuel50 | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Fuel50 and Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fuel50 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next