§ The result
Gem leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Gem finishes 21 points clear of HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 55 against 34 — across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Of the 7 criteria HireLogic wins none, and the narrowest lead Gem holds is on FRIA Support, Gem 35 to HireLogic 25. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Gem 66, HireLogic 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Gem holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Gem
Gem is an AI-first recruiting platform combining a talent CRM, AI sourcing and outreach automation, candidate engagement, and a newer applicant tracking system with AI-powered application review and ranking.
Vendor profile
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
§ The record
Gem is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireLogic is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Gem | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Gem 66 · HireLogic 15
9.2 weighted points to Gem
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Gem 58 · HireLogic 42
3.2 weighted points to Gem
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Gem 47 · HireLogic 28
2.3 weighted points to Gem
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Gem 57 · HireLogic 45
1.8 weighted points to Gem
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Gem 61 · HireLogic 48
1.6 weighted points to Gem
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Gem 35 · HireLogic 25
1.5 weighted points to Gem
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Gem 62 · HireLogic 45
1.4 weighted points to Gem
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +20.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gem minus HireLogic.
| Category | Weight | Gem | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 66 | 15 | +51 | +9.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 61 | 48 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 28 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 55 (F) | 34 (F) | +21 | +20.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gem | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gem has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Gem sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Gem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gem last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next