§ The result
HeyMilo leads Glider AI on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo scores 61 (D) and Glider AI 52 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. HeyMilo is ahead of Glider AI on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Article 11 Technical Documentation at Glider AI 52 to HeyMilo 58. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Glider AI 68, HeyMilo 83, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, HeyMilo under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Glider AI | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Glider AI 68 · HeyMilo 83
2.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Glider AI 52 · HeyMilo 58
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Glider AI 54 · HeyMilo 62
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Glider AI 55 · HeyMilo 64
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Glider AI 35 · HeyMilo 42
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Glider AI 40 · HeyMilo 46
0.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Glider AI 60 · HeyMilo 66
0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 83 | -15 | -2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 46 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 61 (D) | -9 | -8.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next