§ The result
Glider AI leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Glider AI finishes 23 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 52 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Glider AI takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Glider AI 40 to JobDiva 30. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Glider AI 68, JobDiva 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Glider AI
Glider AI is a skills-validation platform that screens and verifies candidates with auto-scored skills assessments and coding simulations, autonomous AI video and voice interviews that score responses against job requirements, live coding interviews, AI proctoring, and biometric ID verification.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, JobDiva under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Glider AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Glider AI | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Glider AI 68 · JobDiva 15
9.5 weighted points to Glider AI
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Glider AI 52 · JobDiva 28
4.8 weighted points to Glider AI
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Glider AI 54 · JobDiva 38
2.4 weighted points to Glider AI
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Glider AI 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to Glider AI
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Glider AI 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to Glider AI
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Glider AI 60 · JobDiva 42
1.4 weighted points to Glider AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Glider AI 40 · JobDiva 30
1.2 weighted points to Glider AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +23.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 23.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +23 beside that +23.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Glider AI minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Glider AI | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 28 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 15 | +53 | +9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 38 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 52 (F) | 29 (F) | +23 | +23.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Glider AI | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Glider AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next