The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Glider AI by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, LinkedIn Recruiter, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 57 and Glider AI, filed under Assessment, on 52, 5 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of LinkedIn Recruiter: LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Glider AI on Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Glider AI — Glider AI 68, LinkedIn Recruiter 50, on an 18% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage Glider AI holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Glider AI1
  • LinkedIn Recruiter6
Widest raw gap
Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 50
Heaviest weighted swing
Bias Audit Transparency18% weight

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordGlider AILinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20202002

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight29% of the movement so far

    Glider AI68
    LinkedIn Recruiter50

    3.2 weighted points to Glider AI

  2. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight56% of the movement so far

    Glider AI52
    LinkedIn Recruiter67

    3.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight68% of the movement so far

    Glider AI55
    LinkedIn Recruiter66

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight79% of the movement so far

    Glider AI54
    LinkedIn Recruiter62

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight90% of the movement so far

    Glider AI40
    LinkedIn Recruiter50

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. Customer Documentation

    8% weight96% of the movement so far

    Glider AI60
    LinkedIn Recruiter68

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. FRIA Support

    15% weight100% of the movement so far

    Glider AI35
    LinkedIn Recruiter38

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.6.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Glider AI minus LinkedIn Recruiter, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightGlider AILinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5267-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%6850+18+3.2
FRIA Support15%3538-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5462-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5566-11-1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%4050-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%6068-8-0.6
Total100%52F57F-5-4.6

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGlider AILinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%276Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Glider AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next