The result

SmartRecruiters leads Glider AI on all 7 criteria.

SmartRecruiters sits 10 points above Glider AI under rubric v1.0 — 62 (D) against 52 (F) — with SmartRecruiters filed under ATS-integrated and Glider AI under Assessment. SmartRecruiters is ahead of Glider AI on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Customer Documentation at Glider AI 60 to SmartRecruiters 63. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Glider AI 52, SmartRecruiters 70, 20% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage SmartRecruiters builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Glider AI0
  • SmartRecruiters7
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation52 vs 70
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, SmartRecruiters under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

RecordGlider AISmartRecruiters
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20202010

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight36% of the movement so far

    Glider AI52
    SmartRecruiters70

    3.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight53% of the movement so far

    Glider AI68
    SmartRecruiters78

    1.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  3. FRIA Support

    15% weight68% of the movement so far

    Glider AI35
    SmartRecruiters45

    1.5 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight80% of the movement so far

    Glider AI54
    SmartRecruiters62

    1.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight89% of the movement so far

    Glider AI40
    SmartRecruiters48

    1.0 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  6. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight98% of the movement so far

    Glider AI55
    SmartRecruiters62

    0.8 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

  7. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Glider AI60
    SmartRecruiters63

    0.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.1.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Glider AI minus SmartRecruiters, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightGlider AISmartRecruitersΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5270-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%6878-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%3545-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5462-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4048-8-1.0
Customer Documentation8%6063-3-0.2
Total100%52F62D-10-10.1

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGlider AISmartRecruiters
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain10Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%276Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain112Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Glider AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SmartRecruiters last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next