HomeCompareGlider AI vs Spark Hire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Glider AI vs Spark Hire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Spark Hire and Glider AI.

Spark Hire holds a 1-point edge over Glider AI under rubric v1.0, 53 to 52, across the Video interview and Assessment cohorts. Glider AI takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 4 for Spark Hire, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Human Oversight Design (Glider AI 55, Spark Hire 62) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Glider AI 52, Spark Hire 58), the second being 37% of the weighted advantage Spark Hire holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Glider AI is filed under Assessment AI, Spark Hire under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordGlider AISpark Hire
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20202012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Glider AI 52 · Spark Hire 58

    1.2 weighted points to Spark Hire

  2. 18% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Glider AI 68 · Spark Hire 62

    1.1 weighted points to Glider AI

  3. 15% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Glider AI 54 · Spark Hire 60

    0.9 weighted points to Spark Hire

  4. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Glider AI 55 · Spark Hire 62

    0.8 weighted points to Spark Hire

  5. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Glider AI 35 · Spark Hire 30

    0.8 weighted points to Glider AI

  6. 8% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Glider AI 60 · Spark Hire 64

    0.3 weighted points to Spark Hire

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Glider AI 40 · Spark Hire 38

    0.2 weighted points to Glider AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Glider AI minus Spark Hire.

CategoryWeightGlider AISpark HireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5258-6-1.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%6862+6+1.1
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5460-6-0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%6064-4-0.3
Total100%52 (F)53 (F)-1-1.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGlider AISpark Hire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%276Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain164Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Glider AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Spark Hire has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Glider AI and Spark Hire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Glider AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 20 for Spark Hire, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Glider AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Spark Hire last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.