Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs HireLogic
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Gloat leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
Gloat sits 13 points above HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 34 — with Gloat filed under Sourcing and HireLogic under Video interview. Gloat leads every one of the 7 criteria, HireLogic none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Gloat 28 to HireLogic 25. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Gloat 38, HireLogic 15, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- HireLogic0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight33% of the movement so far
Gloat38HireLogic154.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight49% of the movement so far
Gloat58HireLogic451.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight62% of the movement so far
Gloat62HireLogic481.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat42HireLogic281.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat62HireLogic451.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat48HireLogic421.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28HireLogic250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus HireLogic, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 15 | +23 | +4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 45 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 34F | +13 | +12.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.