Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs HireVue
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
HireVue leads Gloat by 11 points.
HireVue sits 11 points above Gloat under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 47 — with HireVue filed under Video interview and Gloat under Sourcing. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of HireVue: HireVue is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Gloat on Customer Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 38, HireVue 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat3
- HireVue4
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight56% of the movement so far
Gloat38HireVue807.6 weighted points to HireVue
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Gloat48HireVue653.4 weighted points to HireVue
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat28HireVue351.1 weighted points to HireVue
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
Gloat62HireVue550.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat58HireVue550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat42HireVue450.4 weighted points to HireVue
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62HireVue600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus HireVue, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 65 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 80 | -42 | -7.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 58F | -11 | -11.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.