Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Intervue.io
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Gloat leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Gloat finishes 16 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 31 — across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Gloat leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Intervue.io leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 38, Intervue.io 12, 18% weight), is only 29% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- Intervue.io0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 12
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Intervue.io under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Intervue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight29% of the movement so far
Gloat38Intervue.io124.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight54% of the movement so far
Gloat48Intervue.io284.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight73% of the movement so far
Gloat58Intervue.io383.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight82% of the movement so far
Gloat42Intervue.io301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat62Intervue.io541.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight94% of the movement so far
Gloat62Intervue.io501.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Intervue.io220.9 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +16 beside that +15.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Intervue.io, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Intervue.io | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 28 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 12 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 22 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 54 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 31F | +16 | +15.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Intervue.io | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.