Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Jobvite
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Jobvite
Jobvite is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition suite (part of Employ Inc.) that uses AI for candidate matching, intelligent messaging, and screening, with explanations of why candidates fit a role.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
2 points separate Gloat and Jobvite.
Gloat holds a 2-point edge over Jobvite under rubric v1.0, 47 to 45, across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of Gloat, with 1 level: Gloat is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Jobvite on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 62, Jobvite 55 — and at a 12% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat4
- Jobvite2
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Human Oversight Design62 vs 55
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Human Oversight Design12% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobvite under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Jobvite |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Human Oversight Design
12% weight30% of the movement so far
Gloat62Jobvite550.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight47% of the movement so far
Gloat42Jobvite380.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight63% of the movement so far
Gloat58Jobvite550.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat48Jobvite500.4 weighted points to Jobvite
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight89% of the movement so far
Gloat62Jobvite580.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Jobvite300.3 weighted points to Jobvite
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Jobvite, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Jobvite | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 50 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 45F | +2 | +1.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Jobvite | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobvite last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.