Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs myInterview
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
myInterview
myInterview is an asynchronous one-way video interview platform that records candidate video responses and applies AI-assisted "Smart Shortlisting" and Big Five-based personality insights to help recruiters screen and rank applicants.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Gloat leads myInterview on all 7 criteria.
Gloat, filed under Sourcing, comes out 10 points above myInterview, filed under Video interview: 47 against 37 under rubric v1.0. Gloat leads every one of the 7 criteria, myInterview none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Gloat 38 to myInterview 35. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Gloat 62, myInterview 40) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Gloat 58, myInterview 42), the second being 24% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- myInterview0
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation62 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, myInterview under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | myInterview |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight24% of the movement so far
Gloat58myInterview422.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight44% of the movement so far
Gloat48myInterview382.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight62% of the movement so far
Gloat62myInterview401.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight79% of the movement so far
Gloat62myInterview481.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight90% of the movement so far
Gloat42myInterview331.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat38myInterview350.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28myInterview250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus myInterview, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | myInterview | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 38 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 48 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 37F | +10 | +9.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | myInterview | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 6 | Sources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; myInterview has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 7 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for myInterview sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for myInterview, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- myInterview last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.