HomeCompareGloat vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Gloat vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Gloat leads Talview by 5 points.

Gloat scores 47 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Gloat, with 1 level: Gloat is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Talview on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Gloat 58, Talview 48, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordGloatTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Gloat 58 · Talview 48

    1.5 weighted points to Gloat

  2. 12% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Gloat 42 · Talview 32

    1.2 weighted points to Gloat

  3. 12% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Gloat 62 · Talview 55

    0.8 weighted points to Gloat

  4. 8% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Gloat 62 · Talview 52

    0.8 weighted points to Gloat

  5. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Gloat 28 · Talview 25

    0.4 weighted points to Gloat

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Gloat 48 · Talview 50

    0.4 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Gloat minus Talview.

CategoryWeightGloatTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4850-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3838--
FRIA Support15%2825+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5848+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6255+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4232+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6252+10+0.8
Total100%47 (F)42 (F)+5+4.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGloatTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%218Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Gloat last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.