HomeCompareGloat vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Gloat vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Gloat leads Talview by 5 points.

Gloat scores 47 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Video interview cohorts. Gloat leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Talview leads 1, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Gloat 58, Talview 48, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordGloatTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 29% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Gloat 58 · Talview 48

    1.5 weighted points to Gloat

  2. 12% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Gloat 42 · Talview 32

    1.2 weighted points to Gloat

  3. 12% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Gloat 62 · Talview 55

    0.8 weighted points to Gloat

  4. 8% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Gloat 62 · Talview 52

    0.8 weighted points to Gloat

  5. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Gloat 28 · Talview 25

    0.4 weighted points to Gloat

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Gloat 48 · Talview 50

    0.4 weighted points to Talview

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Gloat minus Talview.

CategoryWeightGloatTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4850-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3838--
FRIA Support15%2825+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5848+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6255+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4232+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6252+10+0.8
Total100%47 (F)42 (F)+5+4.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGloatTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%218Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Gloat last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.