HomeCompareGloat vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Gloat vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tenzo AI leads Gloat by 9 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Tenzo AI, filed under Screening, finishes on 56 and Gloat, filed under Sourcing, on 47, 9 points apart. The criteria split evenly, 3 each to Gloat and Tenzo AI, with 1 level, and the weighted points on the side Tenzo AI holds, headed by Bias Audit Transparency, settle the total. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 38, Tenzo AI 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 79% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordGloatTenzo AI
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Gloat 38 · Tenzo AI 83

    8.1 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  2. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Gloat 28 · Tenzo AI 40

    1.8 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  3. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Gloat 48 · Tenzo AI 45

    0.6 weighted points to Gloat

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Gloat 58 · Tenzo AI 55

    0.4 weighted points to Gloat

  5. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Gloat 42 · Tenzo AI 45

    0.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Gloat 62 · Tenzo AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Gloat

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Gloat minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeightGloatTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4845+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3883-45-8.1
FRIA Support15%2840-12-1.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6260+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4245-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%47 (F)56 (F)-9-9.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGloatTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%22Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%218Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Gloat last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.