Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs TestDome
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
TestDome
TestDome sells pay-per-candidate online skills tests for coding, Excel and more than 100 other skills. The tests are scored automatically, and open-ended answers can be scored by AI. AI analysis of webcam and screen proctoring recordings flags possible cheating, and a live code-interview tool is included.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Gloat leads TestDome on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Gloat, filed under Sourcing, comes out 10 points above TestDome, filed under Assessment: 47 against 37 under rubric v1.0. TestDome is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Gloat takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, Gloat 62 to TestDome 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 38, TestDome 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- TestDome0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, TestDome under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | TestDome |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | HR |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight43% of the movement so far
Gloat38TestDome154.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight59% of the movement so far
Gloat48TestDome401.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Gloat42TestDome301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat58TestDome501.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat62TestDome521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62TestDome600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus TestDome, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | TestDome | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 40 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 15 | +23 | +4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 37F | +10 | +9.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | TestDome | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; TestDome has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for TestDome, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestDome last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.