Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Willo
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Willo
Willo is a browser-based asynchronous (one-way) video interview platform that lets employers collect recorded video, audio, multiple-choice and written candidate responses, then uses AI to transcribe, summarize, rank candidates against employer-defined "Blueprint" criteria, and flag scripted or AI-generated answers.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
Gloat leads Willo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Gloat, filed under Sourcing, finishes on 47 and Willo, filed under Video interview, on 41, 6 points apart. Willo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Gloat takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, Gloat 28 to Willo 25. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 48, Willo 38, 20% weight), is only 33% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Willo0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Willo under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Willo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight33% of the movement so far
Gloat48Willo382.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight57% of the movement so far
Gloat38Willo301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight70% of the movement so far
Gloat58Willo530.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight82% of the movement so far
Gloat42Willo360.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight93% of the movement so far
Gloat62Willo540.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Willo250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Willo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Willo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 38 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 53 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 36 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 54 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 41F | +6 | +6.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Willo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Willo has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Willo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Willo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.