Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs JobDiva
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse scores 67 (D) to 29 (F) for JobDiva, a 38-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. On every one of the 7 criteria Greenhouse scores 20 raw points or more above JobDiva, which leads none of them. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Greenhouse 86, JobDiva 15, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- JobDiva0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
Only Greenhouse is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight34% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86JobDiva1512.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight60% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78JobDiva2810.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight70% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64JobDiva383.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58JobDiva303.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight87% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66JobDiva403.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42JobDiva223.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64JobDiva421.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +37.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 37.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +38 beside that +37.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus JobDiva, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 28 | +50 | +10.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 15 | +71 | +12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 38 | +26 | +3.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 40 | +26 | +3.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 30 | +28 | +3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 42 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 29F | +38 | +37.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.