§ The result
Greenhouse leads Maki People by 5 points.
Greenhouse scores 67 and Maki People 62 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Greenhouse leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Maki People leads 2, including FRIA Support. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 78, Maki People 62 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Greenhouse | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Greenhouse 78 · Maki People 62
3.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 55% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Greenhouse 42 · Maki People 57
2.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Greenhouse 66 · Maki People 50
1.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Greenhouse 86 · Maki People 80
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Greenhouse 58 · Maki People 52
0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Greenhouse 64 · Maki People 70
0.5 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Greenhouse 64 · Maki People 62
0.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 62 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 80 | +6 | +1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 57 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 70 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 62 (D) | +5 | +4.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next