Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs PageUp
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads PageUp on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse and PageUp finish 3 points apart, 67 to 64, as two ATS-integrated entries. Greenhouse is ahead of PageUp on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Data Governance Disclosure at Greenhouse 64 to PageUp 63. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Greenhouse 86, PageUp 80, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 36% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- PageUp0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and PageUp are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight36% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86PageUp801.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight62% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78PageUp740.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58PageUp550.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight84% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42PageUp400.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66PageUp640.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64PageUp630.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64PageUp630.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus PageUp, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 74 | +4 | +0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 80 | +6 | +1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 63 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 64 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 63 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 64D | +3 | +3.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.