Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Pinpoint
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads Pinpoint by 10 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Greenhouse and Pinpoint at 67 (D) and 57 (F), a gap of 10 points. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Greenhouse: Greenhouse is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Pinpoint on Data Governance Disclosure. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Pinpoint 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 74% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse5
- Pinpoint2
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and Pinpoint are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | JE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight69% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Pinpoint427.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Pinpoint721.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Pinpoint520.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Pinpoint380.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Pinpoint680.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight99% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Pinpoint640.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Pinpoint660.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Pinpoint, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 72 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 42 | +44 | +7.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 68 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 64 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 66 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 57F | +10 | +9.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.