Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Pinpoint
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows — candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Pinpoint | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 72 | +6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 42 | +44 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 68 | -4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 64 | +2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 66 | -2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 57 (F) | +10 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
Pinpoint
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- public statement
- 5
- absence
- 2