Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Workday Recruiting AI
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads Workday Recruiting AI by 11 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Greenhouse and Workday Recruiting AI at 67 (D) and 56 (F), a gap of 11 points. Workday Recruiting AI takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Customer Documentation among them, against 6 for Greenhouse, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Workday Recruiting AI 60 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse6
- Workday Recruiting AI1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 60
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
Only Greenhouse is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Workday Recruiting AI604.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight64% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Workday Recruiting AI352.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Workday Recruiting AI701.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight89% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Workday Recruiting AI551.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Workday Recruiting AI351.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight99% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Workday Recruiting AI650.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Workday Recruiting AI650.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Workday Recruiting AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 70 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 60 | +26 | +4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 65 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 65 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 56F | +11 | +11.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 28 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.