Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs HireLogic
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HireLogic
HireLogic joins phone, video and in-person interviews to transcribe them and generate AI notes, job-description coverage, candidate insights and flags for potentially discriminatory interviewer questions, and also offers an asynchronous AI interview agent that scores candidates on relevance and depth of knowledge.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
hackajob leads HireLogic on all 7 criteria.
hackajob sits 11 points above HireLogic under rubric v1.0 — 45 against 34 — with hackajob filed under Sourcing and HireLogic under Video interview. hackajob is ahead of HireLogic on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at hackajob 20 to HireLogic 15. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (hackajob 60, HireLogic 42, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 34% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob7
- HireLogic0
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 42
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HireLogic under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HireLogic is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | HireLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight34% of the movement so far
hackajob60HireLogic423.6 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight52% of the movement so far
hackajob58HireLogic451.9 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight63% of the movement so far
hackajob38HireLogic281.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight74% of the movement so far
hackajob60HireLogic451.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight84% of the movement so far
hackajob32HireLogic251.1 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight92% of the movement so far
hackajob20HireLogic150.9 weighted points to hackajob
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob55HireLogic480.8 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus HireLogic, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | HireLogic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 45 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 48 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 45 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 34F | +11 | +10.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | HireLogic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HireLogic has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireLogic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireLogic last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.