Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs HireVue
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
HireVue
Asynchronous video interviewing platform with optional AI-driven assessment scoring of candidate responses.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
HireVue leads HackerEarth by 12 points.
HireVue, filed under Video interview, comes out 12 points above HackerEarth, filed under Assessment: 58 against 46 under rubric v1.0. HackerEarth takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Customer Documentation among them, against 6 for HireVue, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerEarth 35, HireVue 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 68% of the weighted advantage HireVue holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth1
- HireVue6
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, HireVue under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight68% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35HireVue808.1 weighted points to HireVue
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight84% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55HireVue652.0 weighted points to HireVue
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56HireVue600.5 weighted points to HireVue
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32HireVue350.4 weighted points to HireVue
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52HireVue550.4 weighted points to HireVue
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight99% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42HireVue450.4 weighted points to HireVue
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57HireVue550.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus HireVue, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | HireVue | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 65 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 80 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 58F | -12 | -11.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | HireVue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HireVue has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HireVue sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 15 for HireVue, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireVue last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.