Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Knockri
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Knockri
Knockri runs asynchronous structured behavioural interviews that candidates answer by audio, video or text; it transcribes the answers, uses NLP models to score the work-related behaviours they describe against a skills framework, and produces per-skill scores and ranked shortlists.
Substantial gaps
Video interview
The result
1 point separates Knockri and HackerEarth.
Knockri (Video interview) edges HackerEarth (Assessment) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. HackerEarth takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 3 for Knockri, whose share includes Human Oversight Design, and 2 are level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Post-Market Monitoring, and HackerEarth holds it (HackerEarth 42, Knockri 35, 12% weight), worth 84% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth builds across the 2 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth2
- Knockri3
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Post-Market Monitoring12% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Knockri under Video interview AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Knockri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight35% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Knockri350.8 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight55% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Knockri600.5 weighted points to Knockri
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight74% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Knockri350.4 weighted points to Knockri
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight93% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Knockri550.4 weighted points to Knockri
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Knockri550.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Knockri, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Knockri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 55 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 47F | -1 | -0.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Knockri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 80 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Knockri last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.